Advertise

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Taxes. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Taxes. Tampilkan semua postingan
Rabu, 15 Juni 2011

Obama’s Student Loans Paid Off, Will Yours?

Obama’s Student Loans Paid Off,

Obama’s Student Loans Paid Off,  Will Yours?



At a White House briefing for online personal finance writers last week, President Barack Obama was asked what money advice he himself had found most valuable.  The President riffed on his Kansas born grandmother, who worked her way up from bank secretary to vice-president and taught him about the importance of saving and the “magic of compounding interest”.   Then he segued to the value of  “investment” —both by the federal government and individuals.
“When Michelle and I graduated from law school our combined debt was $120,000 and it took us 10 years to pay off. We were lucky because we’d gone to a law school where we knew we could earn it,’’ said the Harvard Law alum.   “It remains smart to spend on things that are going to increase your productivity and your income over the long term. In the same way that law school paid off for Michelle and I,” he added.
Obama’s main point was political–namely that his deficit reduction planleaves more room than does House Republicans’  for domestic spending on stuff he deems investments, such as education, infrastructure and research.  But for families, his observation raises an issue just as pressing as the $14.3 trillion federal debt: Is $35,000 in borrowing for a B.A. in philosophy, $50,000  for a master’s in journalism, or $100,000 for a law degree (not from Harvard or Yale) really a smart investment?
In 10 Steps To Make Your Kid A Millionaire,  the cover story of Forbes’ new Investment Guide, William Baldwin suggests that parents encourage their kids to consider getting a cheaper B.A. by attending a less prestigious school that offers them more “merit aid” or by spending two years at a community college first.  As for graduate school, he writes, calculations by Boston University economist Laurence Kotlikoff show that the extra debt and years of lost earnings don’t pay off in significantly higher lifetime consumption. Concludes Baldwin: “Pursue academics if you love hitting the books, Kotlikoff says. Don’t do it for the money.”
Fair enough. Don’t study just for the money. But what if borrowing for education leaves you worse off?  That’s a real risk these days—and not just for low income students enticed to borrow big bucks to attend  for-profit “career colleges” that don’t lead to jobs.
According to preliminary statistics from  the Department of Education, 8.9% of students who were required to begin repaying their federally guaranteed  loans in the year ended Sep. 30th, 2009, had already defaulted by Sep. 30th 2010.
Granted, that group got sucker punched by the Great Recession. Which is why a report by the Institute for Higher Education Policy on the five year repayment history of borrowers who entered repayment in 2005, is even more disturbing. (Technically, you enter repayment six months after leaving school, whether you have graduated or not.)
By the end of five years, 15% of the repayment class of 2005 had defaulted on their loans at some point, while another 26% had became delinquent, missing a payment deadline by more than 60 days, but avoiding default. Mostly, they dodged default by entering “deferment” or “forbearance”—in other words, by postponing repayment. So that’s 41% who had already harmed their credit records and an unknown number who may struggle with their debt for years.
But there’s more.  Another 16% had entered deferment or forbearance based on economic hardship or unemployment, without first technically becoming delinquent.  (In other words, they were conscientious but broke.) Plus, 7% had gotten repayment deferred because they were back in school—and possibly doubling down by taking out still more loans.  Only 37% had been repaying their loans on time, without delay or hiccup, for the full five years.
Not surprisingly,  students who went to two-year career colleges had the worst repayment record: 36% had defaulted and another 27% had become delinquent without defaulting.  But even the most  reliable borrowers–those who attended  four year private not-for-profit colleges– were showing the strain. In that group, 8% had defaulted and  20% had become delinquent without defaulting.
On June 1, the Department of Education released  final  “gainful employment” rules designed to eventually bar career schools whose students don’t earn enough to pay off their debts from the federal guaranteed loan program.  It’s worth noting that the rules were so weakened from an earlier draft, that stocks of such for-profit education companies as  Apollo Group (which owns Phoenix University);  Corinthian Colleges Inc., Strayer Education Inc. and ITT Educational Services jumped.
The new rules apply only to the for-profit sector, although in aprovocative article yesterday, Inside Higher Ed suggested that the idea of measuring higher education outcomes in terms of employability—and return on loan dollars invested—could one day spread to regulations affecting  the rest of the higher education industry.
Let’s hope. But don’t hold your breath. The education lobby is powerful and the federal government has fueled the growth of burdensome (and too often unpayable) student debt, just as it helped  inflate the mortgage bubble.
So for now, it’s student borrower beware. Just because the government is offering to lend you gobs of money, doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to take it.  Remember, this isn’t free cash. Student debts are nearly impossible to erase in bankruptcy and even the government’s new “income-contingent” loan repayment program (which forgives some loans if you don’t earn enough to repay them) could keep you student loan-payment poor for up to 25 years.

Rabu, 08 Juni 2011

What Divorce Means For Your Taxes

There are significant tax consequences to a divorce. Here are some of the most important issues to consider when dividing assets between you and your soon-to-be-ex.

State Law Is Key

How you split assets in divorce depends largely on where you live.
California, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Louisiana, and Idaho are community property states. In these states, any community property assets -- those accumulated by you and your spouse during the marriage -- are owned 50/50. Therefore, each spouse is entitled to half of the total community property, minus liabilities. In contrast, assets that were owned by one spouse before the marriage, or that were received by one spouse as a gift or bequest during the marriage, are generally considered to belong solely to that person.

All other states are so-called equitable distribution states where you and your spouse must split things according to "whatever is fair" in the eyes of the divorce court. That often works out to a 50/50 split, but it's not preordained. Of course, you and your spouse can agree out of court to your own version of "whatever is fair," and the divorce court will generally go along with your proposed deal.

Divorce Tax Basics
 
Now let's talk about the federal tax aspects of divorce.

Tax-Free Transfer Rule Usually Applies 
 
The general rule is that you can divide up most assets, including cash, between you and your soon-to-be-ex without any federal income or gift tax consequences -- thanks to Section 1041 of the Internal Revenue Code. When an asset falls under the tax-free transfer rule, the person who receives the asset takes over its existing tax basis (for tax gain/loss purposes) and its existing holding period (for short-term or long-term holding period purposes).

Example 1: You agree to give your ownership interest in your primary residence and some cash to your spouse in exchange for keeping all the stock in your incorporated small business. You also agree to let your soon-to-be-ex keep your vacation home in exchange for some stocks held in taxable brokerage firm accounts and more cash. These swaps are tax-free thanks to the tax-free transfer rule. The existing basis and holding periods for the homes and stocks carry over to the spouse who winds up owning them.

Tax-free transfers can occur before the divorce or at the time it becomes final. Tax-free treatment also applies to post-divorce transfers as long as they are made "incident to divorce," which means those that occur: within one year after the date the marriage ends; or within six years after that date as long as they are made pursuant to your divorce or separation agreement.

Transfers of Non-Capital-Gain Assets 
 
For years, the IRS appeared to say that the tax-free transfer rule only applied to capital-gain assets. For instance, if you transferred vested stock options to your soon-to-be-ex or certificates of deposit with accrued interest, the IRS wanted you to report the date-of-transfer difference between fair market value and basis as ordinary income on your Form 1040. In other words, you paid the tax even though your ex got the cheese. Now it appears the IRS has reversed and concluded that most ordinary income assets can be transferred tax-free. If so, the spouse who winds up with the asset must recognize the income when the asset is sold or converted to cash (or exercised in the case of stock options).

Even When Tax-Free Transfer Rule Applies, There Are Still Tax Implications
The spouse who winds up owning an appreciated asset (fair market value in excess of tax basis) must recognize taxable gain when it is sold -- unless some exception applies, such as the exclusion for gain on sale of a principal residence.

Example 2: Your divorce settlement calls for your spouse to receive all your long-held Apple shares. Thanks to the tax-free transfer rule, there's no tax impact when the shares are transferred. Your ex keeps on rolling under the same tax rules that would have applied had you continued to own the shares (carryover basis and carryover holding period). When your spouse ultimately sells the shares, he or she (not you) will owe any resulting capital gains taxes.

Heads Up: When you are the one who ends up with appreciated assets, you're on the hook for the built-in tax liability that comes with them. From a net-of-tax perspective, appreciated assets are worth less than an equal amount of cash or other assets that have not appreciated.

Retirement Accounts Are Big Exception to Tax-Free Transfer Rule 
 
The tax-free transfer rule definitely does not apply to tax-advantaged retirement accounts like IRAs or accounts with employer-sponsored retirement plans. You must jump through some hoops to get tax-free treatment if you transfer all or part of your account balances to your ex in divorce. For qualified plan accounts like a 401(k), your divorce papers must include language establishing a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). Then your ex will be responsible for any taxes on his or her share. A different procedure is used to split up your IRA money without getting socked with taxes on funds that go to your ex. See my earlier article on that subject here.

Like any major financial transaction, a divorce can have important tax implications. If you have a healthy net worth or high income, seek advice from a tax professional with experience handling divorces. Be warned: many divorce attorneys are not up to speed on tax issues.
 
© Copyright 2010-2011 Aceh Forex Trading Info-Investment In Gold All Rights Reserved.
Template Design by Herdiansyah Hamzah | Published by Borneo Templates | Powered by Blogger.com.