Advertise

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Personal Finance. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Personal Finance. Tampilkan semua postingan
Minggu, 26 Juni 2011

Esusu banking

Esusu banking

"I tried for several months to get a loan from a bank. They asked me to provide land as collateral, which I do not have. I joined an esusu group with ten members and we contribute N10,000 every month. This has really helped my business as when it was my turn last month I received N100,000. I would never have been able to save that amount to invest in my business. If someone runs away with all our money, we all know each other so I will just go to her house." Mrs Banjoko - Trader

"I formed an esusu group with 12 colleagues; we each contribute N25,000 monthly. It became impossible to meet some of my obligations which required a lump sum and no bank would lend me money without collateral; I didn't have much that I could provide. Esusu has been a blessing. The best thing about it is that unlike when you take loans from the bank, you do not have to pay back with interest."
Millions of Nigerians are not being adequately served by the formal financial sector and remain largely unbanked; they continue to find mainstream financial services to be unaffordable, unresponsive and unfriendly. As this limits their opportunity to save, they are forced to rely on informal modes of saving and depend on the credit unions, co-operatives and Rotating Savings and Credit Associations ("ROSCA"). Such institutions have clearly demonstrated the ability of people to organise themselves at a basic level and come together to save and borrow to their mutual benefit. ROSCAs are the most commonly found financial institution in the developing world and have been in existence in many forms for hundreds of years. Indeed, in some rural areas, they are the sole savings and credit associations.

The "esusu" or "contribution club" is a traditional rotating savings and credit association that has flourished in West Africa for generations and is still widely practiced today. The incentive of participating in "esusu" is the forced savings that it encourages; putting aside money today to benefit from a lump sum payment in the future. Subscribing members contribute a fixed amount periodically. The accumulated funds are usually then assigned to each member of the group in rotation, until all have benefitted from the pool of funds. As a result, each member is able to access a larger sum of money during the life of the association, and use it for whatever purpose she or he wishes.

Access to credit

Formal lending institutions attach stringent conditions to the granting of loans and informal moneylenders tend to be highly exploitative, offering exorbitant interest rates that put credit out of reach of the small borrower. Esusu, in a sense, allows individuals who may ordinarily not have access to credit markets a form of interest-free credit. Through the pooled contributions saved, albeit without interest earned, participants enjoy the possibility of gaining access to the accumulated sum long before the individual has saved up that full amount. Such lump sums make it possible for participants to acquire goods that they may otherwise not be able to afford, pay off debts or meet other pressing obligations. They can also take advantage of the occasional opportunity to improve their general welfare.

Based on trust

This form of collaboration is totally founded on trust. Though naturally there will be instances where members of the groups have been duped of their contributions, yet, even without formal statutes or regulation of their affairs, they usually carry on without fraud or miscalculation. Even in societies where levels of trust on financial matters are questionable, esusu has proved to be popular and effective and continues to be so.

Whilst there is a significant economic role for the esusu and other forms of rotating savings and credit associations, particularly in societies where millions of people remain unbanked, the esusu ignores the whole concept of the time value of money. The first recipients of the pooled funds are thus the main beneficiaries of the scheme, whilst subsequent collectors are essentially lending money to others interest-free; they also have to bear the additional risk of default from other members over time.

Although esusu has played a significant role in helping people cultivate a savings habit, more formal investment clubs have been in existence for decades, and are a more effective way of achieving the saving and investment aims of members. They offer their members a means to grow their personal wealth and learn about investing at the same time.

Unlike the esusu scheme through which contributions are given to one member to spend to acquire consumer items or take care of other needs as they wish whilst others await their turn, members of an investment club make subscriptions and invest the pool of funds as an entity in a variety of instruments including mutual funds, stocks, and real estate. Compensation is expected in the form of interest and dividend payments as well as appreciation in the value of the underlying investments.

Whether you are completely new to investing, or are already a seasoned investor and want to share ideas with like-minded individuals, or you have limited resources for saving and investing and would like to build up your savings, an investment club presents an effective way to grow your wealth.

There is no doubt that the activities of the informal financial sector is a hub of economic activity. The onus is thus on the micro-finance banks and other mainstream financial sector participants to develop appropriate products and services to target the informal sector of the economy.

These informal credit institutions should, through registration and regulatory guidelines, be gradually integrated into the formal financial community to protect members. Until this happens, it will continue to thrive unabated and unregulated.

Simply doing banking better

Simply doing banking better

When Capitec Bank opened its doors in 2001 as South Africa's first new retail bank in 20 years, it was unable to raise a R100 000 loan from financial institutions to buy a pool motor vehicle for its northern areas of operation. Today it has about R3 billion in surplus funds invested with the very same institutions that saw Capitec as a non-starter. And confidence in the bank’s future is underscored by the fact that it has been able to borrow R3 billion to fund its extraordinary growth.
In having surplus funds, Capitec has not only shown what poor judges the big institutions were, but it has also shown up those banks in the way they do business. Most importantly, Capitec has been able to take the presumed high-risk, lower end of the income market and make it a success. So much so that people in the middle- and upper-income levels, fed up with the poor service and high costs of the Big Four, are now streaming in to become customers.
The evidence is in the 2.5 million customers who have joined Capitec since it was launched in 2001. And customers continue to sign up at an astounding rate of 70 000 a month.
Capitec’s success gives the lie to the repeated claims by the Big Four banks that they cannot afford to make banking cheaper because they have to service a very costly low end of the market.
Capitec not only manages to bring low-cost banking to all its customers, it is doing so with extraordinary success for its shareholders. Profits for the year ending February 28, 2010 increased by 45 percent to R435 million, with a final dividend of 155 cents a share. The share price has gone from 90 cents a day after listing on the JSE in 2002 to 15050 cents on November 25, 2010. Its extraordinary share-price performance last year earned it the company of the year award in the Sunday Times Top 100 Companies 2010.
But Riaan Stassen, the chief executive of Capitec, does have some understanding for his competitors. He says modestly that Capitec had the advantage of being a start-up operation.
Stassen says it is similar to how a motor mechanic and a heart surgeon need to perform. A motor mechanic works his wonders when the motor has stopped; a heart surgeon has a more difficult job – the heart has to keep working while the wonders of surgery are performed. In other words, an established bank has to re-invent itself while still serving its existing customer base.
But others have also started and failed. In fact, Saambou, which aimed at being a savings and loans operation like Capitec, failed six days after Capitec listed on the JSE.
However, part of the reason for Capitec’s success is that it has confined itself to savings and loans. “We are not trying to sell VW Golfs and Rolls Royces,” Stassen says.
Those early months were not easy, Stassen says. One month the directors even had to provide the bank with personal loans to pay staff salaries. But, he says, “this taught us a lot of discipline – how to manage liquidity within the bank and how to conserve capital. It is a discipline that has become a culture in the bank and it enabled us to escape the credit crisis.”
Spartan approach
The culture Stassen talks of is evident when you walk into his frugally furnished office in the Stellenbosch Technopark. The office is no more than 15 square metres, and three senior executives share a secretary. This almost Spartan approach is instilled throughout the bank. There are no huge banking halls, no opulent offices for executives, no flying first class, no staying in five-star hotels and no entertaining in fancy restaurants. You are more likely to bump into Stassen walking the streets of a township and enjoying a burger with customers at a local Steers.
Stassen and his executives like to keep their feet close to those of the ever-growing number of customers walking into their 431 branches. For example, he and his senior executives have been at the opening of nearly every one of the ever-expanding national network of branches. He spends one week a month visiting branches, observing customers and finding out what they want.
A major part of the success of Capitec has been that the bank has looked to the interests of its clients first and to profits for its shareholders second. It has simple, understandable products, particularly when it comes to costs. And not only are the costs simple, they are also significantly lower and less complex than those charged by the Big Four.
Capitec has been cashing in on these advantages in the hard-hitting advertising campaign it has been running for the past year, telling potential customers that they will save in costs and in hassles and they will get better service by switching their accounts.
In the words of the campaign’s suave Capitec customer: “Imagine a bank that offers the easiest access to your money, the highest interest on savings and the lowest bank charges ... well, I’ve found a bank that doesn’t waste my money or my time, a bank that does innovative things to simplify my life.”
Part of the success can probably be attributed to the fact that Stassen and Michiel le Roux, co-founder of the bank and now chairman, are not born-and-bred bankers. They and key members of their team came from the liquor industry.
As one analyst quipped, it is probably just as well they left Distillers Corporation, because if they had the long-term success there that they are having in banking, we would be a nation of alcoholics.
Stassen says Capitec uses exactly the same marketing and brand strategies that are used in the liquor industry, focusing on clients’ needs while also recognising the potential of the black consumer market.
In taking the Capitec brand from nowhere to where it is today, the bank has also achieved the distinction of being the only African brand recognised this year in the Credit Suisse research list of 27 “great global brands of tomorrow”.
Le Roux was managing director and Stassen was group financial manager of Distillers when Pepkor chairman Christo Wiese asked Le Roux in 1995 to take over at the troubled and now defunct Boland Bank, headquartered in Paarl.
It was in the brief period that they were at Boland that they spotted the opportunity to provide a simple savings and loans offering. A bank was launched at the Pepkor retail outlets under the brand Pepbank.
But Le Roux, Stassen and other top members of the Capitec team left at the time of the controversial mergers and de-mergers of Boland and the now also defunct NBS and independent trust company BoE – all of which were to land up within the Nedcor/Old Mutual stable.
Even the Boland information technology team has landed up in Capitec as a consequence of Boland Bank’s IT offices being downscaled by Nedbank. And it is technology, Stassen says, that has largely contributed to the success of Capitec.
Capitec Bank started off as a division of the Stellenbosch-based financial services company PSG. It was called Keynes Rational and focused on micro-lending.
In 2001, PSG obtained a retail banking licence and a year later Capitec was listed on the JSE. It aimed at three things: creating an innovative and adaptable technology base, which in turn would have a simplified, focused and low-cost product range delivered through low-cost channels.
Capitec is unapologetically a simple savings and loans bank serving individuals. It does not try to make money by packaging fancy investment products or selling life assurance or anything else.
You can have a transactional account that doubles as a loan account and savings account. That is it. The costs and interest rates (paid and received) are simple in structure and easy to understand.
Assurance that your debt will be repaid if you die or are unable to work due to disability or retrenchment is included in your borrowing costs – and is not added on top purely to generate additional fees.
Zero expectation gap
Stassen says that Capitec aims to have a zero gap between the expectations of customers and what they receive. This benefits customers. It also means that there is no cost to the bank in having to deal with long queues of anxious or upset customers wanting to query what is wrong with their accounts.
For example, he says, watch people around payday at an ATM of a competing bank. Too often you will see them attempt to make a cash withdrawal and then get an account inquiry (at additional cost). The reason is that the amount reflected on their bank balance is not the same as on their payslip. And often the reason for this is that they have been charged fees for a debit order and then for a rejected debit order. When funds come into the account the charges are applied, resulting in a difference between expectations and reality. The next step is to join a queue in the bank to find out what has happened.
The mainline banks have complex charges for internal and external debit orders, and far higher charges for returned debit orders. These charges can be outlandish, depending on the type of bank account and the number of unpaid debit orders, even on rejected amounts as low as R50: FNB charges up to R105, Nedbank up to R120, Absa up to R50 and Standard Bank up to R115. Most on low-entry accounts charge R5 from the second rejection.
Capitec has a simple debit order structure: R2.75 for the debit order and R3.75 if it is unpaid.
And to avoid any double-charging when Capitec customers use a Capitec ATM, the first thing they see when they log in is their bank balance. They know immediately what is in their account, at no cost.
Capitec is upfront about its fee structures. Its documentation and website are designed to provide you with important information, such as bank fees, easily and accurately.
You will struggle to find details of the bank charges of a Big-Four bank on the internet and, when you do, you will find a confusing array of cost options.
Interestingly, the 2009 Horwarth Forensics Study commissioned by financial magazine Finweek has shown that, obscurely, the reason people who want to pay lower charges do not change their bank accounts is because they do not understand the complex fee structures of the traditional banks.
Capitec has one set of costs for all its customers. There are no options.
Stassen says the reason the traditional banks have so many variations on the same theme is purely to maximise fee income, whether it is transacting, saving or borrowing.
He says Capitec succeeds because, as its logo states, “simplicity is the ultimate sophistication” – and it is not a hollow phrase; it strives to live up to it.
The simplicity extends to all Capitec’s products, which are designed to meet expectations.
A Capitec bank account is based on a simple three-legged structure (transactions, savings and loans) wrapped up in what is called the Global One facility.
You open a transactional account, which provides you with access to loan facilities and a choice of various inter-connected savings accounts.
There is a daily access savings account, term-targeted accounts with monthly contributions, and fixed-term deposits.
Generally, most people open a savings account with the hope that their money will grow. But too often at traditional banks they are in for a rude surprise when they discover that the costs outweigh their interest earnings.
Capitec takes a novel approach to savings. It pays interest on a scaled basis and does not rip you off with charges for keeping your money with the bank. The lower you are on the scale, the more it pays. This, Stassen says, encourages savings, particularly among lower-income groups.
Another novel approach is in targeted savings with up to four savings plans, again with scaled interest. For example, you could have a sub-account to pay for the education of your children. You can sign up for a fixed-term (maximum two years) savings plan for each or any of your sub-accounts. If you find you cannot afford the contribution in any one month you are not penalised. However, you cannot access your money before the maturity date.
Lower earners targeted
The Capitec Bank savings products have been designed to at least meet the savings requirements of middle- to lower-income earners.
Stassen says the difference between lower-income and wealthy people is that the wealthy can afford to invest for the longer term to make more money, whereas those with lower incomes tend to achieve their financial goals by saving a portion of what they earn rather than investing it.
Research by Finmark Trust shows that lower-income groups have shorter-term savings horizons. This means that things such as life assurance endowment policies with minimum five-year investment terms and severe penalties if premiums are skipped are unsuitable for these groups.
With its products, Capitec not only tries to encourage saving but also encourages disciplined saving without the downsides of life assurance products, which are widely sold by its competitor banks.
Changing individual behaviour is not restricted to savings. Stassen says that Capitec is succeeding in changing the historical patterns of handling cash, despite most of its customers living in a cash-driven environment, where they have to pay cash for taxis and trains and at shops in townships.
The first step was to encourage employers to pay employees via individual Capitec bank accounts. This reduces the risks and costs of handling cash for both employers and employees.
So far, the bank has signed up more than 70 000 employers, from government departments to micro employers. The bank has about 100 mobile units using wireless transmission travelling around the country, with staff speaking to employers and setting up accounts for employees.
The next step is to encourage customers to use shopping retailers, such as Pick n Pay, Shoprite and Checkers, to draw money.
Last year, Capitec went on a major drive encouraging customers to use retailers, offering zero-cost cash withdrawals at till points. Stassen says this is a major advantage for retailers because it reduces the amount of cash they have to handle and reduces their bank cash deposit fees.
The retailers charge Capitec for the service but Stassen says he is trying to negotiate a cheaper rate that will be passed on to the bank’s customers.
The normal rate for a retailer cash withdrawal is one rand, as against R3.75 at a Capitec ATM.
Capitec cash withdrawals from retailers grew at 65 percent a month from March to September 2010 compared with 15 percent in ATM withdrawals.
Stassen says customers are also being encouraged to withdraw smaller amounts by having wider access to cash withdrawal facilities for more hours a day. There are benefits for both customers and the bank. For the customer, there is greater security in withdrawing money at a retail outlet rather than at an ATM. The bank benefits because customers leave larger amounts in their accounts, and it has to provide fewer ATMs.
Stassen says ATMs have become a major problem because they are targeted by thieves who blow them up to steal the money. This is a double whammy for banks in that cash is stolen and ATMs have to be replaced – at the considerable cost of about R300 000 each.
Further inducements for Capitec customers to use retailers are cost-free debit card purchases and no annual fee for the debit card.
Stassen says there is a definite indication of a change of withdrawal patterns, with money remaining in accounts for longer periods.
He says the same simplicity of approach to saving is taken on the lending side.
Capitec is now the largest provider of unsecured loans in the country, and many banks – even those with large secured loans – would be envious of its low default ratio.
The provision for doubtful debts as a percentage of the R8.6 billion loaned to customers as at August 2010 amounted to 7.1 percent.
If you default on a Capitec loan, you are immediately shown the door and you will never be able to borrow from Capitec again.
If you apply for a loan from Capitec, the first thing that is decided is the term of the loan. The amount is secondary to the term. And the first thing that is considered when deciding the repayment term is not your ability to repay the loan but your employment and, more particularly, your employer and the sector in which your employer operates. In other words: what are the chances of you losing your job and your income, and not being able to repay the loan?
If the borrower is employed in the government sector, the term of the loan is likely to be longer than, for example, someone employed by a bakkie builder.
Stassen says the term, which ranges from one month to a current maximum of 48 months, is important for lower-income borrowers because the consequent lower monthly repayments make the debt more affordable.
Capitec also charges a lower interest rate on longer-term loans. But interest rates are high because the loans are unsecured, with a consequent increase in risk for the bank.
Once the term has been decided, the affordability and the size of the loan is taken into account, with R100 000 being the maximum.
Stassen says longer-term lending, for example by providing home loans, is not in the bank’s plans. He says comparatively few people, particularly in the lower-income end of the market, want home loans.
Streamlined operations
Stassen says that information technology has been key to streamlining the bank's operations and ensuring a high level of security at its branches. Importantly, it enables central control. No one in a branch makes a decision about the granting of a loan. The branch merely feeds the information into the computer system. This enables the bank on busy days to process more than 4 000 loans an hour.
At any time of the day the executives in Stellenbosch can see exactly how much money has been saved and lent, and how many loan repayments are outstanding.
Stassen says: “If there are any hiccups, we can spot them and where they are immediately, allowing for quick corrective action.”
The computer system was developed by an Australian company (now owned by the giant Indian industrial company Tata) and is used by the Indian National Bank, which has 50 million customers.
No one in a branch has to balance up the books at the end of the day, with a side benefit that the bank stays open for longer than its competitors. Most branches are open from 8am to 5pm (Saturdays 8am to 1pm), with some in high-volume areas open from 7am to 7pm.
The branches are where the customers are: near railway stations, taxi ranks, in townships and shopping centres.
The almost 4 000 branch staff are drawn from local communities and they speak to their customers across tables, not through bullet-proof screens. The reason is that cash is not handled in the bank branches. You cannot make a cash withdrawal (this has to be done at an ATM), although you can make a cash deposit, which goes straight into a drop safe.
Capitec also aims at a paperless environment by using computer technology. Open an account and the information is centrally recorded and stored in digital format. Biometrically recorded finger prints and digital photographs overcome the problems of fraudulent identification documents and make it easier for Capitec’s less literate customers.
You need identification, proof of address and a R10 deposit to open an account. There are never any forms to complete, whether you are applying for a loan or opening an account – and it is all processed in less than 10 minutes.
Once you have an account you can also transact via the internet and on your cellphone. You can even get information via Twitter.
Capitec has also used technology to bring cashless banking to remote rural areas. In 2004, Capitec, with Mastercard, launched a world-first pre-authorised debit card with an embedded chip that enables customers to buy from retailers. Retailers can download the transactions – which are guaranteed – once a day. A small personal portable balance reader allows customers to keep track of their finances.
Of the future, Stassen sees Capitec making more inroads into the market share of traditional banks.
“We left everyone with the misapprehension that we were a bank for the unbanked and the under-banked. We are not. We are a bank for anyone who wants simplified, cheap banking.”
This article was first published in the 1st quarter 2011 edition of Personal Finance magazine.

Dynamic Wealth closes

Dynamic Wealth closes



In a significant victory for the Financial Services Board (FSB), controversial Pretoria-based financial services company Dynamic Wealth, which has been mired in legal battles with the regulator and dissatisfied investors, closed its doors this week.
The closure follows a determination by the FSB Appeal Board to reject Dynamic Wealth’s appeal against a decision by Dube Tshidi, the Registrar of Financial Services Providers and the FSB’s chief executive, to withdraw the financial services provider (FSP) licences of two of its subsidiaries, Dynamic Wealth Management and Dynamic Wealth Stockbrokers.
An immediate consequence of the Appeal Board’s decision is that Metropolitan Collective Investments has taken control of the seven unit trust funds that Dynamic Wealth managed and marketed using Metropolitan’s collective investment schemes licence (see “Investors’ money in unit trusts ‘should be safe’”, below).
Commenting on the status of Dynamic Wealth, Cobus van Wyk, the company’s chief executive, says “we are for all practical purposes closed for business, as the company cannot do financial services business, and all assets that were managed have been (or are in the process of being) transferred”.
The FSB is still waging a court battle to place various Dynamic entities under curatorship.
Last year, Dynamic successfully challenged an application by the FSB to place the company under curatorship. The FSB has taken the High Court’s decision on appeal, which is still to be heard.
Dynamic Wealth initially attracted the attention of the FSB when one of its investment offerings started to go sour, which led to the curatorship application.
Some years before the FSB took action against Dynamic, Personal Finance had dealt with complaints from disappointed investors.
High-profile forensic investigator David Klatzow had taken up cases on behalf of investors, who claimed that Dynamic misled them into making incorrect investments.
Over the years, following reports and investigations into the company’s activities, Personal Finance received a number of what transpired to be hollow threats of legal action from Dynamic Wealth.
Among other things, Personal Finance revealed that Dynamic Wealth had a business relationship that involved property bridging finance with Attie du Plooy, who had run an illegal pyramid structure, Jean Multi-Management, which the Reserve Bank closed down.
Jean Multi-Management was the recipient of R200 million that was stolen by Angus Cruikshank, the owner of Ovation, the now defunct linked-investment services provider, from the unregistered and illegal Common Cents fund. Cruikshank committed suicide when the FSB moved in on him.
The FSB’s grounds for the curatorship application last year included the claim that a number of investment portfolios offered by Dynamic Wealth under the guise of investment clubs were in fact illegal collective investment schemes.
Among the “investment club” portfolios was a fund that was caught up in the collapse of Corporate Money Managers (CMM). The fund masqueraded as a unit trust money market fund, but in fact it pooled investors’ money to invest in failed property developments.
After the intervention of the FSB, the “investment club” port-folios were converted into com-panies, and the troubled money market fund became Specialist Income Ltd (SIL). SIL is likely to be the biggest loser in the collapse of CMM, with a potential loss of R230 million.
Converting the “investment club” portfolios into companies reduced the rights of investors, because they became shareholders rather than investors with a preferential claim to any assets.
Gerry Anderson, the FSB’s deputy executive in charge of market conduct, says the consequences of the FSB Appeal Board decision include:
* With immediate effect, Dynamic Wealth Management and Dynamic Wealth Stockbrokers are no longer authorised to do business or accept new business as FSPs.
* The two companies must immediately inform all their clients and product suppliers that their FSP licences have been withdrawn.
* The two companies must, without delay, repay all uninvested funds they have received from clients.
* Where the two companies hold scrip, participating interests, investment vouchers or any other form of proof of investment that belongs to clients, these must be accounted for in full and returned to the people who are entitled to the assets.
* Where appropriate, the com-panies are required, after consulting with their clients and product suppliers, to take reasonable steps to ensure that any outstanding business is transferred to another FSP, in the best interest of clients.
* Shareholders in SIL and investors in the former investment portfolios are to be regarded as investors in Dynamic Wealth Management. Directors of SIL who have no interest in the Dynamic Wealth Group are invited to meet with the FSB to discuss solutions.
* The approved auditors of Dynamic Wealth Management and Dynamic Wealth Stockbrokers must oversee the above process and report to the FSB on their progress, any problems or delays.
Anderson says that investors in Dynamic Wealth who need legal assistance to pursue claims against Dynamic should consult their financial advisers or seek redress through the Ombud for Financial Services Providers, because the FSB is not equipped to help with individual civil claims against financial institutions or former institutions.
Apart from supervising the winding down of Dynamic Wealth’s remaining business, the FSB will continue to pursue legal action against Dynamic, he says.
The FSB’s decision to withdraw the licences of Dynamic Wealth Management and Dynamic Wealth Stockbrokers has been vindicated by the Appeal Board’s decision to dismiss, with costs, Dynamic Wealth’s appeal against its decision, Anderson says.
INVESTORS’ MONEY IN UNIT TRUSTS ‘SHOULD BE SAFE’
Your money should be safe if it is invested in one of Dynamic Wealth’s seven unit trust funds, according to assurances by the Financial Services Board (FSB) and Metropolitan Collective Investments.
Metropolitan has taken over the administration and management of the funds with immediate effect after the FSB Appeal Board approved the decision by the Registrar of Financial Services Providers to withdraw Dynamic Wealth’s financial services provider (FSP) licence.
But in a strange twist, the funds might eventually be managed by the same asset management team that was employed by Dynamic Wealth and that recently resigned from the company en bloc.
Metropolitan has been forced to intervene, because – in terms of a white-label arrangement – Dynamic Wealth used Metropolitan’s collective investment scheme licence to market the seven unit trust funds.
Robert Walton, the chief executive of Metropolitan Collective Investments, says the R900 million of investors’ money in the unit trust funds is not in danger. The funds have provided good returns for investors, Walton says.
Bert Chanetsa, the FSB’s deputy executive for financial institutions, says the FSB is in talks with Metropolitan to ensure that investors’ interests are protected.
Metropolitan was obliged to take over the management of the Dynamic Wealth portfolios in terms of an arrangement with the FSB, he says.
In terms of the legislation that governs white-label arrangements, the FSP licence-holder – in this case, Metropolitan – is responsible for the proper administration of a white-label collective investment scheme and is answerable to the FSB if anything goes wrong.
The seven unit trust funds are: the Dynamic Wealth Accumulator Fund of Funds, the Dynamic Wealth Creator Fund of Funds, the Dynamic Wealth Optimal Fund, the Dynamic Wealth Preserve Fund of Funds, the Dynamic Wealth Property Fund, the Dynamic Wealth Real Income Fund and the Dynamic Wealth Value Fund.
Walton says that Metropolitan will appoint GAMC Securities (Pty) Ltd (to be rebranded as Clarus Asset Managers) as the investment manager of the seven unit trust funds and will apply to the FSB to rebrand the portfolios. Until this happens, Momentum Investment Consulting will manage the portfolios.
However, investors in the funds were confused by a letter sent to them by John Bernard (JB) Smith, who headed the Dynamic asset management team, the members of which resigned from Dynamic.
Smith joined Dynamic Wealth in 2007 and was appointed chief investment officer in 2009.
Smith, in the capacity as a director, claimed in the letter that the unit trusts had been taken over by iBenefit and Valuevest Multimanager.
Gerry Anderson, the FSB’s deputy executive in charge of market conduct, says neither company has been licensed as an FSP and therefore Smith’s claim was untrue.
Walton says that once he was informed about the letter, he told Smith that iBenefit and Valuevest Multimanager cannot take manage the portfolios. Smith was not involved with the problems at Dynamic Wealth, Walton says.
The core of the former Dynamic investment team now works for GAMC Securities, which means that the seven funds could again be managed by the same investment team, albeit under a different brand.
Walton says that Smith would first have to obtain an FSP licence from the FSB to manage the assets. If this does not happen, Momentum will continue to manage the assets.

Credit card offers are back

Credit card offers are back


Seem like you're seeing more credit card offers lately? You aren't dreaming.
Targeting everyone from teenagers to 80-somethings, credit card companies are cranking out more offers, especially to those with good credit ratings.

Lee Marengo, a retired state employee in Sacramento, said she and her husband have been getting lots of tempting credit card offers in the mail.

A longtime credit card user who faithfully pays off her balance each month, the 84-year-old is getting "wonderful" offers for rewards cards, such as a Chase Visa that dangles 5 percent cash-back on gas, groceries and pharmacy purchases.
Marengo typically only uses one card but, "If something new and better comes along, by golly, I'm gonna grab it."
She's certainly not alone in getting credit card offers.

During the recession, card issuers kept a low profile. They got hammered by record rates of defaults by consumers who couldn't pay off their monthly balances. They also got pinched by new consumer protections in the federal Credit CARD Act that clamped down on late payment fees, interest rates and other charges.
But that's old news. Today, as the battered economy starts to heal, credit card defaults and late payments are lower. Banks have adjusted to the new landscape, amping up efforts to grab new consumers.

"There are a lot more mailings going out. The competition among credit card issuers has definitely stepped up," said Bill Hardekopf, CEO of LowCards.com, an online credit card comparison site. "They are sending out many more solicitations, especially to the most sought-after customers: those with good to excellent credit scores."
The spike in credit card mailings was significant this past year, says Anuj Shahani, who oversees tracking services for Synovate, a global market research firm. Direct mailings from credit card companies skyrocketed from 1.39 billion in 2009 to 2.82 billion in 2010, a whopping 103 percent increase.

"With the CARD Act in place and the economy doing better, credit card mailers have come back with a bang and are making up for some lost ground," said Shahani in an email. "We expect to see a modest rise in mailings for 2011."
Credit cards that offer rebates or rewards are where competition is most intense, says Hardekopf. "Issuers are offering some great deals out there, especially in miles and cash back. That is what excites consumers."
But if you're contemplating a new credit card, do your homework. Here are some tips:

Balance vs. no balance

You have to know which camp you're in, says Tim Chen, CEO and founder of NerdWallet.com, a Redwood City-based credit card comparison site.
If you don't carry a monthly balance, get a rewards card. They typically have an annual fee but offer airline miles, cash-back on purchases (groceries, dining, etc.) or discounts at certain stores.
If you do carry a balance, generally go for cards with the lowest interest rate.

Read the fine print

No matter what kind of card you apply for, be sure to read the disclosures first. Otherwise, you might get hit with surprise fees later. For instance, a company that brags it has no "annual fee," might instead charge an "application fee," says Ken Lin, CEO of CreditKarma.com, a Bay Area-based credit card site.
"If you take 20 minutes to read the disclosures, it can save you several hundred dollars," said Lin.

Watch out for terms/fees

Many new cards entice people to switch by offering to move your outstanding balance to a new card with a lower rate. But those so-called "teaser rates" usually last only six months or so. Or they can disappear entirely and be replaced by a sky-high rate if you fail to make a monthly payment on time.
For instance, let's say you've got a $2,000 balance on your credit card that's charging 20 percent APR. You get an offer to transfer your old balance to a new card that's only charging 6 percent. Sounds good, eh?
But look at the details: There's an upfront fee of 3 percent. On a $2,000 balance, that's $60. "Not the end of the world," notes Lin, but it's still money out of your pocket.
And if you don't pay on time every month, that super-low interest rate could jump to nearly 30 percent, the typical "penalty pricing" rate. In the end, you could be worse off than if you kept your original card.

Choose rewards wisely

If you buy a lot of gasoline, look at a card that pays cash back. Or if you fly for business or vacations and live in a Southwest Airlines city like Sacramento, it might be worth getting the airline's credit card to rack up miles.
But note that some cash-back rewards are capped, say $250 a year for gasoline purchases.
NerdWallet's Chen likes to tell how he scooped up 225,000 airline miles in one year by signing up for three cards: 75,000 bonus miles each for an American Airlines card from Visa and American Express. And a Capitol One card that did a match-my-miles promotion.

And he didn't get hit with annual charges.
"The fees were waived for the first year, so I just canceled the cards after I got the miles."
With his miles he's flying to Greece this summer.
That's not the kind of consumer that credit card companies are looking for, needless to say.
Every time you apply for a credit card, your credit score can get dinged. That's why it's best to do your homework before applying for too many cards. And if you have a card with a long history of good payments, don't cast it aside just because you see a better-looking deal out there. Hang onto it for the long-term benefit to your credit score.

Best tip: Always pay your credit card bill on time. "If you do, you're gonna save a lot of money. If you don't, that's where they get you," says CreditKarma's Lin.

Senin, 20 Juni 2011

Too Much Debt For A Mortgage?

Too Much Debt For A mortgage?


Your debt-to-income ratio is a personal finance measure that compares the amount of money that you earn to the amount of money that you owe to your creditors. For most people, this number comes into play when they are trying to line up the financing to purchase a home, as it is used to determine mortgage affordability. (For more information, see Mortgages: How Much Can You Afford?)
Once financing has been obtained, few homeowners give the debt-to-income ratio much further thought, but perhaps they should. In this article, we will show you how this powerful ratio is used.
Calculating Debt-to-IncomeCalculating your debt-to-income ratio isn't hard and it doesn't cost a dime. There are two main ways to calculate this depending on the debts included in the calculation.
The less strenuous way to measure this ratio is to compare all housing debts, which includes your mortgage expense, home insurance, taxes and any other housing-related expenses. Once you have the total housing expense calculated, divide it by the amount of your gross monthly income.
For example, if you earn $2,000 per month and have a mortgage expense of $400, taxes of $200 and insurance expenses of $150, your debt-to-income ratio is 37.5%.
The more encompassing measure is to include the total amount of money that you spend each month servicing debt. This includes all recurring debt, such as mortgages, car loans, child support payments and credit card payments.
When calculating this ratio, don't count monthly expenses such as food, entertainment and utilities.
Gross Versus Net IncomeFor lending purposes, the debt-to-income calculation is always based on gross income. Gross income is a before-tax calculation. As we all know, we do get taxed, so we don't get to keep all of our gross income (in most cases). Because you can't spend money that you never receive, the result is a somewhat aggressive picture of your spending ability.
Consider the $2,000 per month gross monthly earnings example. After taxes at 2008 annual tax rates that imposed a flat rate of $802.50 plus 15% of the amount over $8,025, that $2,000 per is reduced to about $1,708 or less (depending on retirement plan contributions and other factors).
Despite the original debt-to-income calculation, you can't pay your bills with gross income, and the net income (take-home pay) is  less than the number used in the calculation. That's nearly $300 that was used to help determine your spending ability but that won't actually be there to work with when it comes time to pay your bills. 
Don't forget that, if you are in a higher income bracket, the percentage of your net income lost to taxes will be even higher. Regardless of your tax bracket, you'll almost certainly be better served by a more conservative approach to your debt-to-income ratio calculation. For anything other than loan eligibility, consider basing your calculations on net income rather than gross income. Using the net number provides a much more realistic picture of your ability to spend.
Good and Bad NumbersYour debt-to-income ratio tells you a lot about the state of your financial health. Lower numbers are indicative of a better scenario because less debt is generally viewed as a good thing. After all, if you don't have debts to service, you will have more money for other things. From exotic vacations to saving for retirement, most people can think of a million ways to spend a few extra dollars. Unfortunately, a high debt-to-income ratio often means that there aren't many extra dollars left at the end of the month.
So, what is a good ratio? Traditional lenders generally prefer a 36% debt-to-income ratio, with no more than 28% of that debt dedicated toward servicing the mortgage on your house. A debt-to-income ratio of 37-40% is often viewed as an upper limit, although some lenders will permit ratios in that range or higher. However, although lenders may be willing to give you the loan, that doesn't mean that you should take it.
Keep in mind that an increasing number of people are in the 41-49% range, a zone where financial trouble is imminent. Nearly all experts agree that a debt-to-income ratio above 50% is living dangerously. For many people, the best ratio is as close to 0% as possible, a number that represents debt-free living. While everyone has bills to pay and most of us have at least some recurring debt, unless your income source is unlimited and guaranteed, a lower debt-to-income ratio is almost always better than a higher ratio. (For more insight, see Are You Living Too Close To The Edge?)
An EqualizerMonitoring your debt-to-income ratio is a great way to keep tabs on your expenses and your buying power. Regardless of whether you earn $25,000 a year, $100,000 a year, or $1 million a year, your debt-to-income ratio provides a snapshot of your spending habits. It's possible to have a small income yet, courtesy of good spending habits, have a low debt-to-income ratio. It's also possible to have a high income but poor spending habits, resulting in a high debt-to-income ratio. In the end, it's not how much you earn but how much you spend that makes all the difference.
ConclusionKeep in mind that the more you add in debts, either through housing or recurring debts, the higher your ratio will be. The higher your ratio, the more likely you are to be in financial danger. To make sure you're on the path to financial freedom, you can calculate this ratio each quarter to keep your finances moving in the right direction.
If your debt-to-income ratio doesn't paint the picture of economic health that you'd prefer to see, you'll need to take steps to improve the picture. To find out how to move in the right direction, read The Indiana Jones Guide to Getting AheadGet Your Finances In Order and Three Simple Steps To Building Wealth. 
 
© Copyright 2010-2011 Aceh Forex Trading Info-Investment In Gold All Rights Reserved.
Template Design by Herdiansyah Hamzah | Published by Borneo Templates | Powered by Blogger.com.